Saturday, February 27, 2010

Tech-Bites For Your Heart ♥

As, "necessity is the mother of invention", Canadian and other medical inventions are the reflections of particular circumstances: the need for vital diagnoses of the complex and very different illnesses and diseases. 245 babies are born every minute, and 102 people die each minute. If we do the math then 143 new members are added in the world population every minute. On Feb 24, 2010, 6:51, the world population was 6,804,833,483.


But how is it that the birth rate and the death rate are not equal? The answer is invention. The inventions have enabled the death rate to decrease and so every second the world population is different. But how do these medical inventions benefit people, i.e. humans? The most complex living thing on this planet is the human body. The inventions ensure our health, not just by helping doctors locate where and what disease we have, but also helping us live longer than we would by supplying to us, the supplements and medicine, that would help. These inventions also help us visualize this magnificent and unique living thing on earth.



This all did not just come from no where, but were great contribution of some remarkable people and entrepreneurs. The X-ray that came along in 1895, were discovered by Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen, who received the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901. As the November dusk darkened the laboratory, he had noticed that whenever he made sparks in the tube, a fluorescent screen at the other end of the laboratory table glowed slightly. This was the signal that he had been looking for, the sign that invisible rays were being produced in the spark tube, crossing the room and striking the screen, producing the faint glimmer. To track the rays he had been putting pieces of card in their way, but the screen continued to glow whether the cards were there or not as if the rays were able to pass clean through them. He then tried to block the rays with metal but thin pieces of copper and aluminium were as transparent as the card had been. He moved a piece of lead near to the screen, watching its shadow sharpen, and it was then that he dropped it in surprise: he had seen the dark skeletal pattern of the bones as his hand moved across the face of the screen. Still doubting what he saw he took out some photographic film for a permanent record. Röntgen had made one of the most monumental discoveries in the history of science: X-rays, and seen for the first time images that are today common in every hospital casualty department. Six weeks later, on the Sunday before Christmas 1895, he invited his wife Bertha into the laboratory and took a shadow-graph of the bones of her hand with her wedding ring clearly visible. This is one of the most famous images in photographic history and propelled him within two more weeks into an international celebrity. The medical implications were immediately realised and the first images of fractured bones were being made by January 1896 even though none yet knew what the mystery rays were. (Nobleprize.org) This was one of the most important inventions as it set the basis for many other inventions.



One great inventions that came along after the X-ray was the CT or CAT scan. CT scan was discovered independently by a British engineer named Sir Godfrey Hounsfield and Dr. Alan Cormack. It has become a mainstay for diagnosing medical diseases. For their work, Hounsfield and Cormack were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in 1979. CT scans are special x-ray tests that produce cross-sectional images of the body using x-rays and a computer. These images allow the radiologist, a medical doctor who specializes in images of the body, to look at the inside of the body just as you would look at the inside of a loaf of bread by slicing it. This type of special x-ray, in a sense, takes "pictures" of slices of the body so doctors can look right at the area of interest. CT scans are frequently used to evaluate the brain, spine, chest, abdomen, pelvis, and sinuses. Here's an article about how this development helps boost survival rates for severe injuries. A team of researchers led by Stefan Huber-Wagner of Munich University Hospital conducted the first large-scale study to find out whether the technique increased survival rates:
http://www.vancouversun.com/health/scans+boost+survival+rates+severe+injuries/1436028/story.html


Another great invention that came that helps doctors and surgeons look at internal organs such as stomatch is endoscopy. Endoscope, the instrument used in endoscopy, is usually referred to as "an instrument used in medical operations which consists of a very small camera on a long thin tube which can be put into a person's body so that the parts inside can seen" (Oxford dictionary) or "An instrument for examining visually the interior of a bodily canal or a hollow organ such as the colon, bladder, or stomach." (Dictionary.com). Endoscopy is a medical operation in which an endoscope is put into a person's body so that the parts inside can be seen (Dictionary.com). In 1806, Philip Bozzini built an instrument that could be introduced in the human body to visualize the internal organs. He called this instrument "Lichtleiter". Bozzini used an aluminum tube to visualize the genitourinary tract. The tube, illuminated by a wax candle, had fitted mirrors to reflect images. In 1853, Antoine Jaen Desormeaux, a French surgeon first introduced the 'lichtleiter' of Bozzini to a patient. For many surgeons he is considered as the "Father of Endoscopy". Again in 1867, Desormeaux, used an open tube to examine the genitourinary tract, combining alsohol and turpentine with a flane in order to generate more condensable beam of light.


Another invention, that came as an innovation of the endoscopy, was the laparoscopy. Laparoscope, used in the surgery of laparoscopy, is a slender tubular endoscope that is inserted through an incision in the abdominal wall and used for viewing the abdominal or pelvic cavities (Dictionary.com). Laparoscopy is an eximination of the inside of the body using a tube-shaped instrument that can be put through the wall of the abdomen. Laparoscopy, a branch of endoscopy, branched out after gastroscopy and hysteroscopy. The innovation, that came along the time, introduced laparoscopy in 1901, when the first experimental laparoscopy was performed in Berlin by a German surgeon Georg Kelling. Thus, it is difficult to credit one individual with the pioneering of the laparoscopic approach.


First introduced to the medical world in 1950s, ultrasound has become the second most widely-used diagnostic imaging modality today. Sound waves of very high frequencies can easily and harmlessly penetrate human flesh. As waves enter the body, they encounter different materials such as the bone and internal organs. These materials cause the waves to reflect back to the source. Because the waves reflect back differently, physician can identify the type of tissue by the nature of the reflection. Without the invention of the ultrasound device, doctors wouldn’t be able to view the fetus of a woman and even see internal organs and bones that could in fact save lives or help prevent damages.


The great discoveries in the medical world have lead to great decreases in the death rate and increases in the life expectancy rate. Using the latest technologies, doctors are more equipped and are more correct in their predictions about the diseases. These technologies have also enabled us to learn more about ore complex human bodies, and the internal body systems such as digestive, circulatory and respiratory, and have enabled doctors to find cure for their patients and perform successful surgeries.


Sources:
http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html
http://www.wholesomewords.org/missions/greatc.html
http://www.discoveryofinsulin.com/Home.htm
http://www.vancouversun.com/health/scans+boost+survival+rates+severe+injuries/1436028/story.html
http://www.mta.ca/about_canada/study_guide/doctors/better_foods.html
http://inventors.about.com/od/mstartinventions/a/medicine.htm
http://nobelprize.org/educational_games/physics/x-rays/index.html
http://laparoscopy.blogs.com/endoscopyhistory/chapter_6/index.html
http://www.laparoscopyhospital.com/history_of_laparoscopy.htm
http://library.thinkquest.org/16541/eng/learn/library/content/ultrasound.htm

Monday, January 11, 2010

Organic and Inorganic Farming and Production: Does it Really Affect Us !?!?!?!?!?!

How and why is there a difference between how farming is done and food is produced? Actually farming is distributed in 2 categories; Organic and Inorganic. But what is the difference and how and what effect does it have on us. Canada is a great producer of in organic foods. The reason behind this that its temperature doesn’t hold the capacity of growing plants according to its season and requirements. Not only the plants but the animals also have a capacity to produce according to seasons.


But how do we distinguish between organic and inorganic production? The basic difference between the two types of production is the amount of pesticides and fertilizers used.


Organic farming is the form of agriculture that relies on green manure, biological pest control and mechanical cultivation to maintain soil productivity and control pests, by excluding or strictly limiting the use of synthetic fertilizers and synthetic pesticides. In raising animals for milk production, egg production or as food, organic farmers don’t use hormones, and use anti-biotic to only treat an animal known to be infected with a treatable disease.



Inorganic farming, also called conventional farming, on the other hand involves using pesticide for the purpose of controlling pests, and use of other manufactured fertilizers and herbicides. Inorganic farmers use often use antibiotics even though no disease is present, as a preventative; they also use certain antibiotics and hormones which they believe will increase the rate and amount of growth or production. In inorganic farming, farmers basically artifically choose the characteristics of palnts and animals.


But the question is that how these two types of farming really affect us and why would we be caring about which one do we eat? There are many categories to look at in terms of categories like pesticides, food additives, essential vitamins and minerals, and antioxidants; some of the categories that artificial, conventionally-grown, food and organic food have differences in.

1) PESTICIDE:
Under organic standards, the routine use of pesticides is not allowed. Currently, over 400 chemicals are being used on a regular basis in conventional farming to kill weeds, insects and other pests that attack crops. The most pesticide used in conventional farming such as organophosphates are linked with a wide range of cancers, decreasing male fertility, and fetal abnormality. Pesticide residue found in foods of conventional farming has been ranked among the top three environmental cancer risks by the government. In a study of children aged 2 -4 living in Seattle, concentrations of pesticide residues up to six times higher were found in children eating conventionally farmed fruit and vegetables compared with those eating organic food. Children might be particularly more vulnerable to pesticide residue because of their more intake of water and food per body weight and because their immature organs have an inadequate capability to detoxify these substances.


2) FOOD ADDITIVES
Food coloring and additives are the cause of a range of health illnesses, like allergic reactions, headache, asthma and many other illnesses. Even thought some additives are added in organic food such as iron, vitamin B and vitamin B3, and other vitamins and minerals for legal purposes, all artificial colorings and artificial sweeteners are banned in organic food.
Particular additives not allowed in organic food are monosodium glutamate, aspartame, phosphoric acid, and hydrogenated fats. Each of these are banned because of their evidence of being damaging to the health of human beings, and of carrying no nutritional benefits but the risk of many diseases such as heart diseases.


3) ESSENTIAL VITAMINS AND MINERALS
There is growing information and evidence that organic food contain more vitamins and mineral than conventionally grown food. A systematic review of the evidence comparing the vitamin and mineral content of organic and conventionally grown food found that, on average, organic food contains higher levels of vitamin C and essential minerals such as calcium, magnesium, iron and chromium.
An independent review of the evidence found that organic crops had significantly higher levels of all 21 nutrients analyzed compared with conventional produce including vitamin C (27% more), magnesium (29% more), iron (21% more) and phosphorous (14% more). Organic spinach, lettuce, cabbage and potatoes showed particularly high levels of minerals.


4) ANTIOXIDANTS
To reduce the high risks of coronary heart diseases, a high intake of antioxidants is recommended. Such antioxidants include certain vitamins such as vitamin-E and other substances are known as phenolics. The presence of phenolics is found to be less in conventionally grown food than what is recommended daily for healthy humans. Danish researchers have found organically grown food to contain 10% to 50 % more of these phenolics than inorganically grown food.



There are many advantages of organic food but that has to be some disadvantages of it. Organic food is way more expensive than inorganic food. And it is not as easy to find organic food than inorganic food.


But the numbers of disadvantages are ruled out by the number of advantages. What is not so commonly known is that organic food can help relieve obesity as part of your weight loss attempt. Eating organic food also means you will be giving your body a greater quantity of essential nutrients, especially if you steam your vegetables.



One of the essential parts of the body is the liver. The liver requires enough fiber to operate make it the most efficient. Conventionally grown food is the number one source of toxins. A tired, toxic liver is the number one reason why many people’s weight-loss attempts are floored.

So what is learned, not that conventionally grown food and fast food should be totally be avoided but should be avoided as much as possible. One must be aware of what he or she is eating and what effect it will have on his/her diet.

The moral of the blog: “Eat LESS but eat WELL” because natural is obviously better than artifical.



Sources:

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_organic_and_inorganic_farming

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_farming

http://www.cog.ca/workshops/

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/10587.php

http://ezinearticles.com/?Organic-Food---Can-It-Help-Relieve-Obesity?&id=286618

Blogs Commented On:

Myra Pereria - Selecting the plants and animals of future, is it as easy as it seems?

Sheereen Harris - What a Wonderful World

Monday, November 16, 2009

Designer Babies - Like It Or Not, Here They Come

Is It Morally Right To Let Couples Choose The Genes Of Their Children





Long before 21st century, people envisioned with both, horror and hope, a day when babies could be custom designed - free of inherited diseases, yet equipped with desirable characteristics of the parents. "Designer babies" is a term used by the media and the journalists to describe this soothing yet frightening scenario.



But this frightening scenario is slowly and steadily taking a strong and definite shape in the western world. The Fertility Institutes in New York, Los Angles and Mexico recently stunned the community by being the first one to boldly offer couples the opportunity to screen their embryos not only for diseases but also for gender and other characteristics like eye color, hair color and complexion. The institute proudly claims that it is and will continue to facilitate and provide new, almost any conceivable customization as science makes them available. As couples arrive from around the globe flocking in doors to pay the institute their life's savings for a custom designed baby, opponents hold responsible the institute for shattering moral and ethical boundaries.



Is the institute really accountable and can it really be blamed for shattering moral boundaries? Or is it the "trend" of the western world? Is it the necessity or helplessness of one? Or is it a competition between two?


The answer lies within our own heart and faith. What is morally right or wrong for one might not necessarily be right or wrong for another. Everyone has their own opinions and necessities. If the technology, and research is used in the right manner, that is to help the couples who are actually at a high risk of conceiving a child who can inherit diseases from which the child has a risk of dying very young or even before being born, or to help those who are at a risk of conceiving one with disability, then it could be said to being used in a moral manner. If it is used in the manner of choosing desirable characteristics within a child that the couple wants, like blue eyes and blond hair, then it could said to be going against the moral conduct. Just because they want their child to have their desired characteristics, they are taking away the uniqueness of the child in their hand just to fulfill some of their wishes.



Couples considering this way of "genetic enhancement" should elaborate in thinking about the rights and wrongs about it. Being it very expensive, they need to think about their financial status and what effect will it have on other people who are not a financial status of affording it. They need to think about how their child's behaviour be toward those without genetic enhancement. They need to think about the high risk that is involved in these kinds of experiments. they need to think about all the options, concerns and risks involved in these genetic enhancement experiments.








For some it might be a necessity. But for some it could only be a competition that could put their future child's life at risk. Parents need to think about their child before they actually think about their own desires. Because right can be wrong and wrong can be right for anyone, according to their circumstances. Well, what ever it is, the future will indeed be interesting.



Genetic Enhancement Cartoon

Sources:

http://www.bionetonline.org/English/content/db_cont1.htm

http://www.bionetonline.org/English/content/db_eth.htm

http://www.fertility-docs.com/

http://www.fertility-docs.com/fertility_gender.phtml?PHPSESSID=5e957af3bceb31870e64ca28ef815b09

http://scientificamerican.com/media/inline/regulate-designer-babies_1.jpg

http://www.k21.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/designer_baby_babies.jpg


Blogs commented on:

http://yurisbioblog.blogspot.com/

http://bluegreenteal.blogspot.com/


Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Human interventions have altered natural systems







Human intervention has caused widespread climatic changes and alterations, like permafrost thawing, around the globe, many of which can be observed. These observed impacts include changes to the physical global system, such as shrinking glaciers and lakes and rivers warming. Biological systems are also impacted in a variety of ways such as birds arriving earlier during migration periods, blooming of plants earlier in the spring, and plant and animal species moving towards Earth's poles. In places such as oceans, lakes, and rivers, fish and plankton are shifting from cold-adapted to warm-adapted communities. Other forces, such as using forests for agriculture, have significant influence on the observed impacts. Human are greatly influencing climatic change through the emission of greenhouse gases. The warming has caused physical and biological systems to change that is observable at a global scale.








Human Intervention Causing Global Warming


Global warming is happening through the burning of fossil fuels which release green house gases and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere which causes increase in global temperatures. Human consumption of fossil fuels have increased in the past few years that has, in turn, increased the amount of harmful gases that is causing the depletion of the invisible ozone layer in the upper atmosphere, in turn, increasing the amount of UV rays that reach the earth's surface.





The sun's energy is absorbed by the earth. The earth re-emits the energy back as heat. As the concentration of the green house gases and carbon dioxide increase, more and more of the heat is trapped, keeping the heat from escaping.










Some facts about Global Warming:



  • During the last 100 years, global sea levels have increased 4 to 8 inches.


  • Earth's temperature has increased 1 degree Fahrenheit in the last century.


  • The past 50 years of warming has been attributed to human activity.


  • The United States was responsible for 20 percent of global green house gases in 1997.


  • Warmer weather provides breeding grounds for insects such as malaria carrying mosquitoes.



Our Part As Humans

Apart from being responsible for ourselves and our loved ones, each of us has a responsibility towards Mother Nature and our environment. We have no liberty to do what ever we like with the environment. It is not ours to treat as we please. As being part of the environment, we have a responsibility towards it. Since we hold it in trust, we have to manage it responsibly, not just for our own benefit but for later generations, of ours and all other species of this Earth.









Sources Used:

http://www.panda.org/about_our_earth/aboutcc/problems/impacts/
http://orthodoxwiki.org/Global_Warming
http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-66880.html
http://webpages.csus.edu/~bm884/global-warming.jpg


Blogs commented on:
http://krisy516blog.blogspot.com
http://Kyanbioblog.blogspot.com